Become a Member

Your membership in NHF will impact 7 billion lives on this Planet.

Join Us


Support NHF’s Work!

Please consider making a gift today to support the NHF’s work.

Donate


Free e-List

Get the latest updates impacting your health and health freedom!

Subscribe

 

Campaigns

Support the National Health Federation’s focused efforts in the following areas:


Docket No. CDC-2016-0068

CDC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Control of Communicable Disease

COMMENTS BY THE NATIONAL HEALTH FEDERATION

The National Health Federation – the World’s oldest health-freedom organization – asks that the Centers for Disease Control withdraw its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the supposed Control of Communicable Disease (Docket No. CDC-2016-0068; CDC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Control of Communicable Disease).

If adopted, the Proposed Rulemaking (PRM) would be a direct and burdensome infringement of the personal liberties of Americans with no proven benefit to assisting in the control of communicable diseases beyond the means that are already at hand.

For all of the following reasons and more, the NHF recommends that the CDC withdraw the PRM in its entirety and at once.

Previously jubilant Industry not so jubilant as NHF’s predictions come true

By Scott C. Tips, National health Federation President and General Counsel specializing in food and drug law

16 August 2016

I truly wish that I had been wrong. Four years ago I predicted in writing that the whole-food industry’s jubilance over the decision of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to revise the FDA’s Draft Guidance for Industry: Dietary Supplements: New Dietary Ingredient Notifications and Related Issues would be short-lived and lead to nothing more than crumbs for the industry and consumers alike. And, on August 11, 2016, the FDA finally issued its revised New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) draft Guidance,[i] proving me right and throttling any industry glee in its collective throat. Crumbs for all of us, imperiously cast down by a rogue agency that does not listen to Congress or to its supposed, ultimate masters, the U.S. citizenry.


July 5, 2015

By Scott C. Tips, NHF President  & General Counsel

Now that California Governor Jerry Brown has signed into law California Senate Bill 277 (the bill forcing the vaccination of every child who wishes to attend public or private school in California unless there is a “legitimate” medical reason otherwise), the National Health Federation (NHF) has been receiving many calls and emails, frantically demanding to know what is being done to curtail the government’s insinuation into private parental concerns: the forced, compulsory vaccination of their children with unsafe vaccines pushed by the drug industry and their cohorts in the State legislature. We are facing the pre-Nuremburg forced vaccinations all over again right here in 2015.

Phyllis writes, “Hi, I am frightfully concerned over the passage of the vaccine bill recently in California.  What, if anything, can be done about it, and will we be forced to vaccinate our precious children to send them to school? Will there be any exemptions?  I am a member of the NHF, and my daughter is beside herself as to what to do to prevent having to vaccinate her two children, ages 1-year and 4-years old. Please answer ASAP. Bless you all and thank you in advance for your help and all you do.”  Others contacting us express similar concerns. And rightly so.

NHF logo Inspired by our goals and work in the World? Please consider donating to NHF. And please, join NHF as a member! You will stay abreast of important issues affecting health and health freedom with our complimentary, members-only quarterly flagship Health Freedom News™ magazine.